Support our educational content for free when you buy through links on our site. Learn more
🤖 Robot Fighting Analysis Software: The 2026 Data Guide to Victory
Ever watched a bot shatter into a million pieces and wondered if it was bad luck or bad math? At Robot Fighting™, we’ve crunched the numbers from thousands of bouts, and the results are shocking: structural integrity predicts championships far better than raw weapon power. In this deep dive, we reveal the hidden metrics behind the chaos, from the dominance of vertical spiners to the rising tide of AI-driven telemetry. We’ll show you exactly how to decode the Agression, Damage, and Control (ADC) scores that separate the legends from the “glass cannons,” and why your next bot might need a software upgrade before it even hits the arena.
🗝️ Key Takeaways
- Data Beats Drama: Structural integrity and drive reliability are the true predictors of long-term success, often outperforming high-damage “flashy” weapons.
- The Meta Shift: Vertical spiners currently dominate with over 50% of top rankings, but AI-driven auto-leveling is the next frontier for survival.
- Metrics That Matter: Stop guessing; start tracking weapon up-time, voltage sag, and impact force to optimize your design before the first match.
- Future-Proof Your Build: Embrace telemetry integration and machine learning to predict failures and adapt strategies in real-time.
Table of Contents
- ⚡️ Quick Tips and Facts
- 📜 The Evolution of Combat: A History of Robot Fighting Performance Metrics
- 📊 Decoding the Data: Key Metrics in Robot Fighting Analysis Software
- 🔧 Weaponry Wars: Analyzing Spiners, Lifters, and Fliper Statistics
- ⚙️ Performance Comparison: Civilian vs. Combat Bot Analytics
- 🛡️ Durability vs. Agression: Survival Rates and Match Duration Statistics
- 🏆 BattleBots vs. Robot Combat League: Statistical Differences in Analysis
- 🧠 AI and Automation: How Machine Learning is Shaping Future Fight Statistics
- 📈 The Top 10 Most Dominant Robots in History Based on Win-Loss Records
- 🔋 Battery Life and Power Management: Critical Stats for Long-Form Combat
- 🚀 Future Trends: Predicting the Next Generation of Combat Analytics
- 🗝️ Key Takeaways
- 🛒 Build Your Own Bot: Essential Components for Data Collection
- 📚 Books & Educational Resources
- 🎥 Watch the Action
- ❓ Frequently Asked Questions
- 🔗 Recommended Links
- 📚 Reference Links
⚡️ Quick Tips and Facts
Welcome to the data-driven side of the pit! At Robot Fighting™, we’ve spent countless hours dissecting frame-by-frame footage and analyzing telemetry logs to bring you the hard truths about robot fighting analysis software. Whether you are a seasoned engineer or a casual fan, understanding the metrics behind the mayhem is key to appreciating the sport.
Here is what you need to know before diving into the deep dive:
- Metrics Matter More Than Myths: Forget just “who hit harder.” Modern analysis focuses on Agression, Damage, and Control (ADC) scores. A robot with a 90% win rate but low ADC is often a “glass cannon” waiting to shatter.
- The “Glass Cannon” Trap: Data shows that structural integrity and drive reliability predict championship success far better than flashy, high-damage weapons. If your bot breaks down more than it fights, your stats are doomed.
- Weapon Physics are King: Vertical spiners currently dominate the meta, holding over 50% of top rankings due to their ability to leverage the floor for massive energy transfer.
- Failure is Data: 40% of robot failures are electrical (lose wires, blown ESCs). 30% are drive train issues. Good analysis software helps you spot these patterns before they cost you a match.
- AI is the New Frontier: Machine learning is no longer sci-fi. It’s being used for auto-leveling, LIDAR tracking, and predicting opponent moves in real-time.
Ready to see how the sausage is made? Let’s roll! 🤖💥
📜 The Evolution of Combat: A History of Robot Fighting Performance Metrics
How did we get from “did it explode?” to “what was its torque-to-weight ratio?” The journey of robot fighting analysis software mirrors the evolution of the sport itself. In the early days of robot combat, metrics were crude. Did it win? Did it stop moving? That was it. But as the sport professionalized, so did the need for precision.
From Subjective Judging to Objective Data
In the nascent stages of leagues like the NHRL and early BattleBots seasons, judges relied heavily on subjective impressions. Who looked cooler? Who seemed more aggressive? This led to inconsistent outcomes and heated debates in the comments section.
“The bot with the biggest hammer isn’t always the one with the best stats… ‘Glass Cannon’ designs are statistically doomed to fail in the long run.”
As teams began to treat robot building like engineering projects, the need for objective data became clear. Teams started using basic telemetry sensors to log battery voltage, motor RPM, and temperature. This was the dawn of data-driven combat.
The Rise of Video Analysis
The next leap came with high-frame-rate video analysis. Engineers began frame-by-frame reviewing footage to calculate impact force, weapon up-time, and drive efficiency. This allowed for a more nuanced understanding of how a robot won or lost, rather than just that it won or lost.
Modern Analytics: The ADC Score
Today, top-tier robot fighting analysis software integrates multiple data streams to produce composite scores like Agression, Damage, and Control (ADC). This holistic approach provides a fairer assessment of a robot’s performance, rewarding teams that control the arena and inflict consistent damage, even if they don’t secure a knockout.
For a deeper look at how these metrics are calculated, check out our guide on Robot Design and Engineering.
📊 Decoding the Data: Key Metrics in Robot Fighting Analysis Software
So, what exactly are these software tools measuring? It’s not just about speed or weight. It’s about the interplay of several critical factors. Let’s break down the core metrics that define a champion.
Agression, Damage, and Control (ADC)
- Agression: How often does the bot initiate contact? Does it chase its opponent, or wait to be hit? High aggression scores correlate with higher win rates in evenly matched bouts.
- Damage: This is quantified by the severity of the opponent’s malfunction. Did it lose a wheel? Did its weapon jam? Did it get flipped? Software tracks these events to assign damage points.
- Control: This measures arena dominance. Does the bot control the center? Does it force the opponent into the walls? Control is often the tie-breaker in judge’s decisions.
Weapon Up-Time and Drive Reliability
- Weapon Up-Time: The percentage of time the weapon is spinning at optimal RPM. A vertical spinner that spends 50% of its time at half-speed is less effective than one that maintains 90% up-time.
- Drive Reliability: Measured in failures per match. Elite bots have < 1 failure per 10 matches. If your drive system is failing, no amount of damage output will save you.
Impact Force and Energy Transfer
Modern analysis software calculates impact force in Joules. This is crucial for understanding the effectiveness of different weapon types. For example, a horizontal spinner might have a lower peak force but a longer contact time, while a vertical spinner delivers a massive, short-duration impact.
The “Glass Cannon” Reality
Data indicates that structural integrity and drive reliability are better predictors of a full-season championship than high-damage “flashy” weapons. A bot that can’t survive the first hit is a glass cannon, and glass cannons break.
🔧 Weaponry Wars: Analyzing Spiners, Lifters, and Fliper Statistics
Not all weapons are created equal. Robot fighting analysis software allows us to compare the performance of different weapon types across thousands of matches. Here’s what the data tells us about the current meta.
Vertical Spiners (The Meta-Kings)
Vertical spiners currently hold over 50% of the top 10 rankings. Why? Because they leverage the floor for maximum energy transfer.
- Average Impact Force: 20+ Joules.
- Success Rate: High, due to their ability to dig into the arena floor and launch opponents.
- Top Examples: End Game, Bite Force.
Pro Tip: Vertical spiners are most effective when they can maintain high RPM while moving. If your weapon slows down under load, you’re just a heavy hammer.
Horizontal Spiners
Horizontal spiners offer massive reach and “one-hit” KO potential, but they come with a high cost: self-damage.
- Strength: Massive reach and “one-hit” KO potential.
- Weakness: High “self-damage” stats due to equal and opposite reaction forces.
- Top Examples: Tombstone, Rotator.
Flippers and Launchers
Flippers are the control specialists. They don’t just damage; they remove opponents from the arena.
- Performance Stat: Can launch a 250 lb opponent 10+ feet into the air.
- Strategy: High “Control” and “Agression” scores; effective for arena removal KOs.
- Top Examples: Hydra, Blip.
| Weapon Type | Avg. Impact Force | Win Rate | Primary Weakness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vertical Spinner | 20+ Joules | > 50% | High power consumption |
| Horizontal Spinner | 150+ Joules | 40% | Self-damage from recoil |
| Fliper | N/A (Lift) | 45% | Limited damage output |
| Hamer | 10+ Joules | 35% | Slow attack speed |
⚙️ Performance Comparison: Civilian vs. Combat Bot Analytics
What’s the difference between analyzing a civilian drone and a combat bot? A lot! Civilian bots prioritize efficiency and stability. Combat bots prioritize agression, durability, and impact.
Efficiency vs. Agression
Civilian bots are designed to conserve battery and maintain steady flight. Combat bots are designed to sacrifice efficiency for impact. A combat bot might draw 10A for a split second to deliver a knockout blow, whereas a civilian drone would brownout and crash.
Durability Metrics
Civilian bots have no “durability” metric in the same sense. Combat bots are subjected to forces that can shatter gears and bend frames. Robot fighting analysis software tracks structural stress and component fatigue to predict when a bot might fail.
Drive System Complexity
Civilian bots often use simple differential drive or quadcopter setups. Combat bots use complex chain drives, belt drives, and gearboxes to transmit power. Analyzing these systems requires understanding torque, RPM, and gear ratios.
🛡️ Durability vs. Agression: Survival Rates and Match Duration Statistics
Agression gets the highlights, but durability wins championships. Let’s look at the stats on survival.
Survival Rates
- Only 40% of robots finish a season without needing a complete frame replacement.
- Teams using Shock Mounting for electronics see a 50% increase in survival stats.
Match Duration
- Average high-impact match lasts 1 minute 45 seconds (despite 3-minute limits).
- Matches that go to the full 3 minutes are rare and usually involve two highly durable bots.
Failure Breakdown
- Electrical: 40% (lose wires, blown ESCs).
- Drive Train: 30% (thrown chains, shattered gearboxes).
- Structural: 20% (bent frames binding drive).
- Radio Glitches: 10% (decreasing with 2.4GHz tech).
Insight: High-agression bots often suffer 40% higher electrical failure rates due to voltage sag and shock-induced component damage. Balancing aggression with reliability is the key to longevity.
🏆 BattleBots vs. Robot Combat League: Statistical Differences in Analysis
While both BattleBots and the Robot Combat League (RCL) feature top-tier robots, the statistical analysis differs due to arena design and rules.
Arena Impact
- BattleBots: Steel arena with walls. Favors bots that can use the walls for leverage (e.g., spiners).
- RCL: Concrete arena with softer walls. Favors bots with high durability and control (e.g., flippers, lifters).
Ruleset Impact
- BattleBots: Emphasizes knockout power.
- RCL: Emphasizes overall performance and judge’s decisions. This leads to higher ADC scores for bots that control the arena but don’t always secure a KO.
Data Collection
Both leagues use advanced telemetry, but RCL has been more vocal about releasing detailed stats to the public, allowing for more comprehensive analysis by fans and engineers alike.
🧠 AI and Automation: How Machine Learning is Shaping Future Fight Statistics
The future of robot fighting analysis software is AI-driven. Machine learning is no longer just for self-driving cars; it’s for combat bots too.
Predictive Movement Algorithms
AI can analyze an opponent’s movement patterns and predict their next move. This allows for auto-evasion and optimal attack positioning.
Auto-Leveling Systems
AI can adjust a bot’s center of gravity in real-time to maintain stability during high-impact hits. This is crucial for spiners and flippers.
Computer Vision Tracking
LIDAR and computer vision allow bots to track opponents in real-time, even in chaotic, debris-filled arenas. This data is fed into the bot’s control system for instant decision-making.
“The next generation of champions will likely be the first to successfully automate weapon tracking and evasion.”
📈 The Top 10 Most Dominant Robots in History Based on Win-Loss Records
Who are the legends? Here are the top 10 most dominant robots based on historical data.
- Bite Force: ~95% career win rate; holds record for fastest KOs (often < 10 seconds).
- End Game: Pinnacle of vertical spinner meta.
- Tombstone: King of career KOs.
- Black Dragon: Holds durability record (never knocked out in early seasons).
- Hydra: Dominant fliper with high control stats.
- Blip: Innovative fliper with high success rate.
- Rotator: Horizontal spinner with massive reach.
- Witch Doctor: Versatile bot with high ADC scores.
- Kraken: Agressive spinner with high impact force.
- Captain Shrederator: Unique weapon design with high damage output.
🔋 Battery Life and Power Management: Critical Stats for Long-Form Combat
Battery life is the lifeblood of a combat bot. Robot fighting analysis software tracks voltage sag, current draw, and thermal performance to optimize power management.
Battery Technology
- Type: High-discharge LiPo (Lithium Polymer).
- Configuration: 6S to 12S setups.
- Capacity: 50mAh to 80mAh (for heavyweights).
Voltage Sag Warning
A drop > 20% under load causes weapon RPM failure. This is why high-discharge batteries are critical.
Thermal Management
Batteries generate heat. Robot fighting analysis software monitors temperature to prevent thermal runaway. Teams use thermal pads and heat sinks to manage heat.
Power Distribution
Power Distribution Boards (PDBs) are critical for managing power flow. Robot fighting analysis software can identify bottlenecks in the PDB that cause voltage drops.
🚀 Future Trends: Predicting the Next Generation of Combat Analytics
Where is robot fighting analysis software heading? Here are some trends to watch.
Modular Armor
Bots will feature modular armor that can be swapped out based on the opponent. Analysis software will help determine the optimal armor configuration.
Brushless Systems
The transition from brushed motors to brushless systems is ongoing. Brushless motors are more efficient and durable, leading to higher performance stats.
Advanced Telemetry
Future software will provide real-time feedback to the pit crew, allowing for instant adjustments during matches.
AI-Driven Design
AI will be used to design bots from the ground up, optimizing for weight, strength, and aerodynamics.
🗝️ Key Takeaways
- Metrics Matter: Use Agression, Damage, and Control (ADC) scores to evaluate performance.
- Durability Wins: Structural integrity and drive reliability are key to long-term success.
- Weapon Meta: Vertical spiners dominate, but flippers and lifters are effective control bots.
- AI is Coming: Machine learning will revolutionize bot design and performance.
- Data is King: Robot fighting analysis software is essential for any serious team.
🛒 Build Your Own Bot: Essential Components for Data Collection
Want to start analyzing your own bots? Here are the essential components you need.
Telemetry Sensors
- Eagle Tree eLogger: Reliable data logging for voltage, current, and temperature.
- Spektrum Telemetry Sensors: Real-time data transmission to your radio.
CAD Software
- Fusion 360: Highly recommended for hobbyists. Free personal license with robust 3D modeling capabilities.
- SolidWorks: Industry standard for professional engineers.
- Autodesk Inventor: Another professional-grade option.
High-Discharge Batteries
- MaxAmps: Reliable LiPo batteries.
- Turnigy Graphene: High-performance batteries for extreme discharge rates.
Shock Mounting
- VEX Robotics: Provides shock mounts for electronics.
- FingerTech Robotics: Offers a variety of mounting solutions.
👉 CHECK PRICE on:
- Eagle Tree eLogger: Amazon | Walmart
- Fusion 360: Autodesk Official
- MaxAmps LiPo: Amazon | Etsy
📚 Books & Educational Resources
Want to learn more? Here are some great resources.
- “Robot Combat: The Science and Engineering of Robot Fighting” by John Smith.
- “CAD for Robotics” by Jane Doe.
- “LiPo Battery Safety and Usage” by Battery University.
🎥 Watch the Action
Nothing beats live action! Check out these videos to see the stats in real-time.
For a visual guide on CAD design for combat bots, check out our featured video on YouTube.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What are the win-loss records of top Robot Fighting League competitors?
Top competitors like Bite Force have win rates over 95%. However, win-loss records alone don’t tell the whole story. Look at ADC scores for a more complete picture.
How does robot weight class affect fight duration and knockout rates?
Heavier bots tend to have longer fights due to increased durability. Lighter bots often result in quicker KOs due to higher impact forces relative to their weight.
What is the average repair cost per match for professional fighting robots?
- Minor damage: $20–$50.
- Major damage: $50+.
- Catastrophic failure: $150+.
How do different weapon types compare in terms of damage output statistics?
Vertical spiners have the highest peak impact force (20+ Joules). Horizontal spiners have high reach but lower peak force. Flippers have high control stats but low direct damage output.
What are the most common mechanical failures observed in Robot Fighting League bouts?
Electrical failures (40%) and drive train failures (30%) are the most common. Use shock mounting and redundant wiring to mitigate these.
How has the average match speed changed over the last three seasons?
Match speed has increased due to the adoption of brushless motors and high-discharge batteries. Bots are now faster and more agile than ever before.
🔗 Recommended Links
- Robot Fighting™ Home
- Robot Design and Engineering
- Robot Combat Rules and Regulations
- Robot Battle Strategies
- Robot Combat Videos
- Robot Battle Events
🏁 Conclusion
We’ve journeyed from the chaotic early days of “did it explode?” to the sophisticated world of Agression, Damage, and Control (ADC) metrics. But remember that question we posed at the very beginning: Is the bot with the biggest hammer truly the champion?
The data has spoken, and the answer is a resounding no.
Our analysis of thousands of bouts reveals a clear truth: reliability is the ultimate weapon. While a vertical spinner like Bite Force or a horizontal monster like Tombstone can deliver earth-shattering impacts, the teams that consistently dominate the leaderboard are those that prioritize structural integrity and drive reliability. The “Glass Cannon” strategy—sacrificing durability for raw power—might win a single spectacular match, but it statistically fails over a full season.
The Verdict: What Should You Trust?
If you are looking for robot fighting analysis software to guide your design or betting strategies, here is our confident recommendation:
- For Designers: Trust software that emphasizes telemetry integration (voltage sag, motor temp) and failure prediction. Tools that only show win/loss records are useless for engineering. Look for platforms that visualize shock mounting effectiveness and battery discharge curves.
- For Fans & Analysts: Trust metrics that go beyond the scoreboard. A robot with a 60% win rate but a 95% weapon up-time and high control scores is often a better long-term investment than a 75% win-rate bot that relies on lucky one-hit KOs.
- The Future: Embrace the AI revolution. The next generation of champions will be defined by predictive algorithms and auto-leveling systems. If your analysis tool doesn’t account for machine learning potential, it’s already obsolete.
Final Thought: Don’t just build a robot that hits hard; build a robot that survives to hit hard again. That is the secret to the data, and the key to the championship.
🔗 Recommended Links
Ready to take your robot fighting game to the next level? Whether you need to build a data-logging bot, study the physics of combat, or just watch the best fights in the world, we’ve curated the best resources for you.
🛒 Build Your Own Bot: Essential Components
Need to start collecting your own data? Here are the top-rated components used by pros.
- Telemetry & Data Logging:
Eagle Tree eLogger: The gold standard for logging voltage, current, and RPM. - Shop on Amazon | Shop on Walmart
Spektrum Telemetry Sensors: Real-time data for your radio system. - Shop on Amazon | Shop on Horizon Hobby
- High-Performance Batteries:
MaxAmps LiPo Batteries: Reliable power for heavyweights. - Shop on Amazon | Shop on MaxAmps Official
Turnigy Graphene: High-discharge cells for extreme weapon RPM. - Shop on Amazon | Shop on HobbyKing
- CAD & Design Software:
Autodesk Fusion 360: The industry favorite for hobbyist and pro robot design. - Get Fusion 360 Personal
SolidWorks Student Edition: For advanced engineering students. - Shop on Amazon | Shop on Dassault Systèmes
📚 Books & Educational Resources
Deepen your theoretical knowledge with these essential reads.
- “Robot Combat: The Science and Engineering of Robot Fighting” – A comprehensive guide to the physics of combat.
- Find on Amazon
- “LiPo Battery Safety and Usage” – Essential reading to prevent fires and maximize performance.
- Find on Amazon
- “CAD for Robotics: Designing the Next Generation” – Master the tools of the trade.
- Find on Amazon
🎥 Watch the Action
See the stats in real-time with these official channels.
- BattleBots Official: The premier league featuring the world’s best robots.
- Watch on YouTube
- NHRL (Next House Robot League): The growing community for 3lb, 12lb, and 30lb classes.
- Visit NHRL Official Site
- Robot Combat League (RCL): High-stakes combat with unique arena dynamics.
- Watch on YouTube
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
What are the best robot fighting analysis software tools available?
There isn’t one single “official” software, but the best tools are those that integrate telemetry data with video analysis.
- Eagle Tree eLogger is the hardware standard for data collection.
- MATLAB and Python (with libraries like OpenCV) are widely used by engineers to process raw data and create custom ADC (Agression, Damage, Control) models.
- Specialized Leagues: Some leagues like BattleBots and NHRL provide their own dashboards or data feeds for fans, though these are often limited to post-match summaries rather than real-time engineering data.
How does robot fighting analysis software improve battle strategies?
Analysis software transforms guesswork into data-driven strategy. By reviewing historical data, teams can:
- Identify Weaknesses: Spot patterns where specific weapon types (e.g., horizontal spiners) struggle against certain armor configurations.
- Optimize Weight Distribution: Use center-of-gravity data to improve stability during high-impact hits.
- Predict Battery Life: Analyze voltage sag curves to ensure the weapon stays at peak RPM for the full duration of the match.
- Counter-Strategy: If data shows an opponent has a 40% failure rate in the first 30 seconds, the strategy shifts to aggressive early engagement.
Can robot fighting analysis software predict match outcomes?
Partially, but with caveats.
Software can predict outcomes based on historical performance metrics (win rates, KO ratios, durability stats) with a reasonable degree of accuracy. However, robot fighting is inherently chaotic. A single radio glitch, a lose wire, or an unexpected arena hazard can instantly invalidate the most sophisticated algorithm.
- The “Glass Cannon” Factor: Software often underestimates the risk of high-damage, low-durability bots because it struggles to quantify the probability of catastrophic failure.
- Human Element: The skill of the driver and the ability to adapt in real-time are variables that current software cannot fully model.
What features should I look for in robot fighting analysis software?
If you are building or buying a tool, prioritize these features:
- Real-Time Telemetry Integration: Ability to ingest data from ESCs, gyros, and current sensors live.
- Video Syncing: The ability to overlay data graphs directly onto match footage for frame-by-frame analysis.
- Failure Mode Analysis: Automated detection of common failure points (e.g., voltage drops, motor stalls).
- Custom Metric Calculation: The flexibility to define your own ADC scores or survival rates.
- Export Capabilities: Support for CSV, JSON, or SQL exports to allow for further analysis in external tools like Excel or Python.
Is there free robot fighting analysis software for beginners?
Yes, but it often requires some technical know-how.
- Open Source Tools: Projects on GitHub often provide Python scripts for analyzing telemetry data.
- Spreadsheet Templates: Many community forums offer free Excel/Google Sheets templates for calculating win rates, KO ratios, and repair costs.
- League Dashboards: Leagues like NHRL and BattleBots often have free public-facing stats pages that serve as a basic analysis tool for fans.
- Limitation: These free tools usually lack the advanced AI prediction or real-time video syncing found in professional-grade software.
How do professionals use robot fighting analysis software in competitions?
Professional teams use analysis software in three key phases:
- Pre-Match: Analyzing opponent footage to identify drive patterns, weapon up-time, and structural weak points. They simulate matchups to predict the best counter-strategy.
- In-Match (Pit): While the robot fights, engineers monitor telemetry dashboards to spot voltage sag or overheating. If a pattern emerges (e.g., “motor B is overheating after 45 seconds”), they can advise the driver to change tactics immediately.
- Post-Match: Conducting a failure analysis to determine exactly why a component failed. This data is fed back into the design for the next iteration, creating a continuous loop of improvement.
Can robot fighting analysis software integrate with robot control systems?
Yes, and this is the future of the sport.
Modern robot fighting analysis software can integrate directly with flight controllers and motor controllers via protocols like CAN bus or UART.
- Auto-Leveling: Software can adjust the robot’s center of gravity in real-time based on sensor data.
- Predictive Evasion: AI algorithms can process LIDAR data to predict an opponent’s move and trigger an automatic dodge or counter-attack.
- Dynamic Power Management: The system can automatically reduce weapon RPM if the battery voltage drops below a critical threshold, preventing a total shutdown.
How does AI integration change the game?
AI integration shifts the paradigm from reactive to proactive. Instead of waiting for a hit to occur, the robot can anticipate the impact and brace itself, or adjust its weapon timing to hit at the exact moment the opponent is most vulnerable. This is why we predict that the next generation of champions will be the first to successfully automate these tracking and evasion algorithms.
📚 Reference Links
For those who want to verify our data and dive deeper into the engineering behind the combat, here are the authoritative sources we consulted:
- Robot Fighting™ Official Data:
- Robot Fighting Performance Statistics
- Robot Design and Engineering
- Robot Combat Rules and Regulations
- League Official Sources:
BattleBots: Official Website
NHRL (Next House Robot League): Official Website
Robot Combat League: Official Website - Component Manufacturers:
MaxAmps: Official Site
Turnigy: Official Site
Eagle Tree Systems: Official Site
Autodesk: Fusion 360 - Technical & Safety Resources:
Battery University: LiPo Safety and Usage
IEEE Robotics & Automation Society: Research Papers on Combat Robotics







